Neoliberals were fine with “open data” when it meant privatising the commons. Now it’s a fascist policy item, they’re distancing themselves.https://twitter.com/puntofisso/status/838703537999720448 …
-
-
Replying to @puntofisso
Indeed. If it was “free as in freedom” instead of “open”. If it was about nurturing a commons instead of privatisation.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @aral
the two are orthogonal - open is a legal statement about licensing, free is an ethical point. I'm for supporting both, for certainty.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @puntofisso
Free is a legal statement about licensing just as open is. The terms differ. Open says you can privatise, fee says you can’t.
3:14 AM - 6 Mar 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.