All device sensors / info should be off limits to web sites unless specially and granularly permitted by the person using the device.https://twitter.com/aral/status/834674874371174400 …
-
-
-
So ask the W3C why this isn’t the case in all their standards and how that benefits their members who make money by tracking/analysing you.https://twitter.com/aral/status/834675468846645248 …
-
W3C is far from some benevolent entity working to improve the web; it’s companies like Facebook/Google standardising
#SurveillanceCapitalism -
Also question every protocol that comes out of Google: it was not born in a vacuum; how does it help further their core business model?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@lukOlejnik You realize that W3C has almost 450 members. https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List … That said browsers don’t need W3C to implement things -
Indeed. And I am also keenly aware that the multibillion-dollar companies rule the roost. +
@lukOlejnik -
That's not true. "billion dollar" companies get one vote just like small non-profits and starts up members
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I encouraged
@lukOlejnik to do this and other privacy reviews in my@w3ctag capacity. This all part of the collaborative process.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you're exaggerating. Raise an issue and the WG will have to respond. NFC is not from
@W3C nor is it always invasiveThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we are getting deeper and deeper into "the Matrix". One day it will live our lives.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.