Because it opens up the possibility of influence and should at least be declared. See revolving doors, institutional corruption.https://twitter.com/webmink/status/823143078122885120 …
My point (which started this whole thread) was that it’s not mentioned in the open letter asking @guardian to retract its article.
-
-
-
Isn't that used to write malware as well?
-
your tone feels like you are not a developer yourself. All languages are used to write malware. your point is?
-
You're picking up a conversation in progress I'm afraid; the comment is ironic and relates to Aral's accusations against others.
-
him using flash which was coincidentally used in malware generation or spying is no argument ->
-
->to defend an ex-facebook employee defending Facebook without a full disclosure of the conflict of interest. ->
-
Given
@AlecMuffett's career history it does not seem very relevant, though. -
and the audience of this article has to know who
@AlecMuffett is without a background search? - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is getting so silly. Do you have it publicly available that you were once a world-renowned /
@webmink >>Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree that would have been better, yes. But given
@AlecMuffett's full history it seems strange to hang much on that omission.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.