@alexanderhanff @lukOlejnik ePrivacy17 seems to rely a lot on consent which (on past experience) will be implicit and blanket. <sigh>
-
-
-
it actually weakens consent considerably, makes it less specific, less limiting and incompatible with GDPR
-
and the last point is where we can attack it. Clearly Commission not interested in previous points
-
what is mind boggling is a question from the audience today about consent...
-
was asked if consent issues weaken privacy and goes against purpose of ePrivacy regulation
-
response was along the lines of "Proposed regulation is not just about privacy...." WHAT? Yes really...
-
Point the reg seems to be missing is this: privacy erosion will happen anyway. It doesn't need help from privacy law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
so
#ePrivacy17 might allow traffic analysis, i.e. analysis of visited sites to offer "premium services"? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.