That said, I don’t think this problem is solvable under Capitalism and the privately-owned “public sphere”.
I was simply noting that under Capitalism, the issue of brand damage cannot be reconciled with free speech.
-
-
I don't agree with this. As long as corps are free to publish what they want, it is free speech.
-
but I'm intrigued by the details of counter-arguments. Why would an entity's choice to not further a thought be limited speech?
-
It’s not. What I’m saying is that we must foster spheres where exchange of ideas don’t have private gatekeepers.
-
now THAT I wholeheartedly agree with. It wasn't my takeaway from your thread, though :-P
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.