@njyo I also believe that the "Developer" and "User" differentiation leads to a hierarchy. One perceived better than other.
-
-
-
.
@Smutchings@aral unless you think the architect or construction worker thinks they are better than the person living in the house.
-
all professional groups have people who think they know better than those outside their profession. All groups.
-
your point being? ALL HUMANS think better of some and worse of others and often lump these together (e.g. "friends").
-
again, as
@Aral has said, an explanation of the status quo. Let's work to make things better, not just say things are as they are. -
sure, refer to everybody as "a person" or "people" for a week. No names, no labels, no descriptors. See how that goes. +
@aral -
We have been – in all code, documentation, and conversations – for the past few years at
@indie and it’s going great. +@Smutchings
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"SELECT * INTO 'sheeple' FROM 'idiots' WHERE 'idiots'.'opinion' < 'my'.'opinion';" [ probably how some people harvesters do DDL ]
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@aral@Smutchings I get what you're aiming at, but it's not so black/white: All are people: some use the product, others design or build. -
.
@aral@Smutchings A restaurant has staff and patrons, a shop has clerks and customers, an F1 team has drivers and mechanics. All are people
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@njyo everybody is an user at the end, but, uniforming is a different form of dehumanizingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.