(Which is a future we can avoid if we build decentralised infrastructure for our new everyday things, including self-driving cars.)https://twitter.com/aral/status/789081463497056256 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hear you on the last point, but driving really is too dangerous and humans are irresponsible users of cars
-
Indeed. Hence why last point (& having decentralised infrastructure) so important. Because you know point 2 is going to happen.
-
I definitely hope there is a way decentralization can make them both work and not be totalitarian, for sure
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BradyDale@nytimes yep sorry dave. I don't bring you. I could bring you to work.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends if the car-driving software is open source...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's one of those points where I have a hard time being 100% anti-surveillance. A robot car world would be a much, much better world.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and cars make the world gross. They are awful. In a fleet system, there'd be fewer cars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
old ladies and kids get killed every week in NYC by aggressive drivers behaving like idiots; there could be a better way to live.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.