& not derived data about you. Not sure if that’s the case. A lot about GDPR will rely on interpretations & case lawhttps://twitter.com/aral/status/775947576797335552 …
-
-
-
(Needless to say, I would like the interpretation in the linked article to be what is required. FB/G will fight it.)https://twitter.com/aral/status/775947829005000705 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that's not how I read it.. and I duscussed with a professor of law. There is court practice already afaik
-
Would love to hear your interpretation. (And hope you’re right.) FB/G will be fighting tooth & nail as it hits their hearts.
-
the definition of 'personal data' in the regulation (and the current directive) us very broad, basically means 'anything about you'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.