It does go to name a few leaders who are opposed though...
-
-
-
My point exactly: The *BMA* is behind the strike and check out the headline. Most will only read the headline.
-
Well it's hardly the fault of the BBC if people form opinions without reading all the facts
-
True. But it is the BBC’s “fault” (more precisely, bias) to place that headline on an article when the BMA backs the strikes.
-
But they've already reported the BMA backing the strikes, when they were announced. This is a development, others coming out against
-
Fair enough. My statement stands based on that article + the feeling I’m getting from their recent (years not days) output.
-
That's cool, wouldn't normally get so involved but there's so many unfounded accusations of bias at the mo. Have a good day!
-
You too :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I noticed this too. Read the article to find out which 'medical leaders' it was. Answer: none of them!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.