@accessjames @schiessle It's just that FS devs are more aware of their principles than OS devs and hence everything labeled FS > OS
-
-
-
Core difference: X Corp can take OS Project A, fence it off, invest $100M to improve it, not share back.
-
that's a question of the license, not whether you call or Open Source or Free Software
-
? Intimately related. The license is the codification of the principles. eg., MIT = OS. GPL = FS.
-
Both, MIT and GPL are Free Software and Open Source licenses. That's also covered by https://fsfe.org/freesoftware/basics/comparison …
-
-
Free Software doesn’t have to be ethical (eg., I can release military drone software under AGPL) +
@schiessle@accessjames@fsfe
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@accessjames@schiessle I believe that technically FS and OS have the same technical prequisites (and limitations) to get corruptedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.