A big thank you to @mediamocracy, @PernilleT, @rikke_frank for organising yesterday’s @DataEthicsEU – they’re doing great work.
-
-
Regulating abuses of people farmers is hugely important—that’s why we made
@betterbyindie—but is just one aspect.https://twitter.com/aral/status/742605879380434945 … -
What we absolutely cannot afford to do at this point is sit around in ivory towers & debate ‘the meaning of privacy’https://twitter.com/aral/status/742606325222395905 …
-
Debating ‘what privacy means’ today is like debating what fireproofing means as your house is burning down.https://twitter.com/aral/status/742606742048083969 …
-
The point is that the enforcement of privacy is impeded by competing definitions of privacy.
-
if we do not have this discussion in transparent open forums. The definitions are made behind our backs by others than us
-
Indeed. Which is my point also: if we, ourselves, cannot agree on a simple definition & move on, we’re only aiding…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
have you looked at ipfs.io? Might be a great fit for
@indie:https://overcast.fm/+I_qEoAms -
Hey Martin, yes; it’s very encouraging.
-
I think so, too. We’re looking into it for
@usenextjournal, I’ll let you know how it goes. -
Cool; please do :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Privacy by Design and contextual identity more advanced than merely talking. Problem is barriers - bad std, reg and BigTech power
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.