To prevent making parasitism vs symbiosis a spectrum, thus limiting the utility of the words, allow me to suggest the following line:
-
-
-
Separation from a symbiote may affect the organisms' quality of life, but they will live. Else, it's not a symbiote. https://twitter.com/aral/status/741711028556292096 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
Depends whether the symbiosis is obligate or not; my point, however, is that corporatism is parasitic not mutualist.
-
W/o force it's mutual by definition; gov asserts monopoly on force. Parasitism: result of gov mkt interference https://twitter.com/aral/status/741718419167424512 …
@aralThis Tweet is unavailable. -
There are no monopolies without coercive force. Government asserts a monopoly on said force. Government. is. force. https://twitter.com/aral/status/741721657560207360 …
This Tweet is unavailable. -
.
@aral democratic governance == tyranny of the majority. Voluntaryism is the answer. -
You want to fight the failures of market coercion by applying even more coercion? The very definition of insanity
https://twitter.com/aral/status/741722818409304064 …This Tweet is unavailable. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Aaaarh! The comments.... the stupid, it burrrrnsss! "Voluntaryism" is government via the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes...
-
...the rules. Since there's no way other than spending or withdrawing spending to hold co's to account, slavery results.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.