Given Google banned content blockers from Play & you called my saying that a lie, care to apologise @jaffathecake?https://twitter.com/aral/status/739704174800216068 …
-
-
-
on iOS a content blocker is like a browser extension = interference with permission. Play Store bans interference without permission.
-
Really? Because I downloaded a system-wide default-browser adblocker app from the Play store without a problem...
-
Unless they reversed decision (again) I can only assume it’s one they don’t know about. See:https://www.androidpolice.com/2016/03/01/google-explicitly-bans-ad-blockers-from-the-play-store-except-all-those-ad-blocking-web-browsers-apparently/ …
-
Ah, looks like it's specifically for Samsung's default browser and not the OS as a whole. Not sure where that falls. It's from Eyeo.
-
it's fine as long as the Samsung Browser allows it.
-
So then the default Chrome browser has a way to add blocking plugins "it allows" too right?
-
an extension system could be built into Chrome yeah. It doesn't exist in Chrome Android right now though.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.