@aral i agree, but what if a poor person has more opportunities through this biased access, what is the moral ground to deny that?
-
-
-
@ErikJonker It’s a false dichotomy and quite a perverse one at that: why should the poor be made to choose between privacy and access? -
@aral i agree , they shouldn't have to choose, but it can be the consequence of an in itself good decision (to stop FB "free internet") -
@ErikJonker “[T]he master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.”—Audre Lorde https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/291810-for-the-master-s-tools-will-never-dismantle-the-master-s-house … -
@aral nice quote i even agree with, but it would imply individual choice/perspective in this is irrelevant (if not in line with master's) -
@ErikJonker@aral Not irrelevant per se, merely problematic. See second part of the ruling.https://twitter.com/why0hy/status/696665497887182848?s=09 …
-
@SimeonNedkov@aral thanks ! Very interesting, i am not arguing to be right, but foremost to better understand, this helps :-) -
@ErikJonker@aral Definitely, me too. I appreciate your views! - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@aral and again those people pay with their#privacy online but their#freedomofspeech too#fbThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
