Saying that a person should not be tried for A *and* B where it is just that they are tried for A and not just for B is not to condone A.
…Especially if the punishment for B is orders of magnitude greater than for A & could involve loss of their life or liberty in perpetuity.
-
-
…Branding those who defend their rights with regard to B as condoning A is tantamount to supporting the injustice of B.
-
…Especially if it’s a false dichotomy perpetuated by the governments involved as they are more interested in pursuing B.
-
…If there’s anyone to blame here for not taking A seriously it is the Swedish, US, & UK governments whose main goal is to indict for B.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.