Because the equivalent of that is the norm in some “privacy” circles. How much more institutionally corrupt can you get?
-
-
-
Funny how non-privacy experts immediately see the problem while professional “privacy experts” seem unable to. https://ar.al/notes/why-im-not-speaking-at-cpdp/ …
-
@aral Perhaps already mentioned, but same companies also sponsored previous years, including when Caspar Bowden was on scientific committee. -
@jLix And, as I understand it, Caspar was against that. Nor does it make it right in any case. -
@aral But he still came along. Your comments about him in your note implies he did/would not. I'm not saying it makes it right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral honest question: why would that be a privacy concern? I can see it being an ethical conflict, but privacy issue I can't. -
@pedroreys It’s an analogy about the ethical implications (see follow up tweets) ;) -
@aral err, will do, sorry :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral btw, I'm not into the privacy community nor am I in the healthcare industry, so I'm probably missing some context here, thus my "?"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.