@MacLemon Yes, but their not connecting to a corporate surveillance agency makes sense too, doesn’t it?
-
-
@aral I'm in favour of enabling those sheeple to connect in a way that allows them to circumvent gov/network blocking and may help them to -
@MacLemon * people -
@aral If people are going to use facebook anyway and there is no other alternative, why not makt things less bad?@MacLemon@AlecMuffett -
@shiromarieke See follow-up tweets. I reject the premise. Facebook can be made socially unacceptable if we don’t play along w their PR dept. -
@aral I understand your point. Still don't agree. People who use tor know that facebook is not privacy friendly and the PR wont work anyway. -
@shiromarieke Everyone else is now seeing news report after news report about how Facebook is protecting privacy. -
@aral Yeah people who don't understand. That's a problem, I agree. -
@shiromarieke It’s not just that. This is priceless PR for Facebook. Sadly, the term “useful idiots” comes to mind. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@aral We won't change their business model and we won't change millions of users who want to use these services of their own choice. :-/ -
@MacLemon But we can make it as socially unacceptable as smoking. And we can create alternatives. -
@aral That I totally support. :-) -
@MacLemon Neat; that alone will make a huge difference. Might be all that’s needed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral not getting killed by their adversaries. I prefer to have connection privacy and reachability versus my ISPs filters/DPI. -
@MacLemon I can see your logic. We can have one without affording positive PR to the other is all I’m saying. They’re it mutually exclusive. -
@aral In my opinion all services should also provide onion services, it should be as normal as HTTP(S) or any other protocol.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.