Substitute “privately” into my original tweet, the irony is still strong with that one ;)https://twitter.com/MacLemon/status/689520010423836673 …
-
-
@aral If Twitter (a service which we both use) would start providing an onion service, would you still be against it? -
@MacLemon *sigh* I’d be against them using it as PR to whitewash the lack of privacy in their business model. Yes. Every time. -
@aral I'm in favour of enabling those sheeple to connect in a way that allows them to circumvent gov/network blocking and may help them to -
@MacLemon * people -
@aral If people are going to use facebook anyway and there is no other alternative, why not makt things less bad?@MacLemon@AlecMuffett -
@shiromarieke See follow-up tweets. I reject the premise. Facebook can be made socially unacceptable if we don’t play along w their PR dept. -
@aral I understand your point. Still don't agree. People who use tor know that facebook is not privacy friendly and the PR wont work anyway. -
@shiromarieke Everyone else is now seeing news report after news report about how Facebook is protecting privacy. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@aral That is totally obvious and it would be delusional to think so. Using tor to access fb, doesn't protect one's privacy from fb. *duh* -
@MacLemon Yes, *duh* for us. “Hey, Facebook’s secure man, they even have Tor and did you hear they support end-to-end encryption” for others
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral Privacy is one side. Security/Safety/Reachability being others. Any measure facebook takes won't bring any privacy versus facebook.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.