Substitute “privately” into my original tweet, the irony is still strong with that one ;)https://twitter.com/MacLemon/status/689520010423836673 …
@MacLemon Yes, but their not connecting to a corporate surveillance agency makes sense too, doesn’t it?
-
-
@aral Whether they want to connect to facebook is their choice, not yours nor mine. -
@MacLemon Of course. To inform them of the danger, however, is up to us. At the very least we shouldn’t aid their PR. -
@aral I dare to slightly disagree. Others block tor entirely, exposing and endangering their users. Like Twitter regularly blocks Tor users. -
@MacLemon Bad and Worse. There is no good here is what I’m saying. -
@aral You consider providing onion services bad? Disregarding who is providing them for the moment. As I said, this is not about facebook. -
@MacLemon NSA announces that it will be providing onion services. We good with that? -
@aral You're arguing that we should ban x, because _some_ bad people use x as well. -
@MacLemon Huh? :) No, I’m criticising Facebook being praised on privacy :) - 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@aral Absolutely, but that is totally missing the point of the very good efforts to properly support connections over Tor here. -
@MacLemon And how much is privacy-washing to make Facebook appear like a trusted service that respects/protects your privacy? -
@aral is totally irrelevant to the benefit of providing access. The adversary tor protects one from is likely a lot worse than facebook. -
@MacLemon Or having dinner with them as we speak.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.