@aral I look forward to your next major conference with international participation and no corporate funding.
-
-
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich And I’ve organised two other international conferences (not on privacy) in the past — never took sponsorship that was suspect.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich I can fit it in a tweet: me (by selling a house + my share in a house) + 1,500 people at crowdfunding last year. That’s it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich I am definitely privileged compared to most—but house was a coop my family paid into for 30 years. It’s also how you use it.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aral
@aral@astepanovich We wouldn't be able to have paid for dinners...but conference would go on. So it limits how much power they have.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @IdentityWoman
@IdentityWoman@aral This is key. They should have no power over content/substance. They shouldn't be able to impact outcomes.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich OK, so if they have no power over content/substance would@rightscon accept The NSA and Palantir as sponsors?+@IdentityWoman3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral But if they wanted to give money with no strings, I'd be ok. Access mostly rejects gov funding.@IdentityWoman2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@astepanovich (As an aside, I’d love to hear your thoughts on @lessig’s concept of institutional corruption sometime.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.