@astepanovich A massive mis-representation of their business model or of their sponsorship of a privacy/human rights conf? +@rightscon
-
-
Replying to @aral
@aral For the record, sponsors of RightsCon have no impact on the substance of the conference or the positions taken by Access@rightscon1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Indeed, and institutional corruption is merely a figment of@lessig’s overactive imagination :) Money = influence.+@rightscon1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich And I’ve organised two other international conferences (not on privacy) in the past — never took sponsorship that was suspect.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich I can fit it in a tweet: me (by selling a house + my share in a house) + 1,500 people at crowdfunding last year. That’s it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich (We’re not rich, dad is a prof, mom a housewife. Both Turkish.) So there are ways. They’re not necessarily easy ways.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@astepanovich My bank balance a week ago had £200 to my name. Let’s not play this game. I’m spending my money for what I believe in…
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.