@aral @anbusch @csoghoian @InfoAPC2015 nut he asks a good question - can u srsly look at programme and suggest appeasement?
-
-
-
@lilianedwards Can you seriously look at the sponsors & suggest lack of influence?#instutionalcorruption +@anbusch@csoghoian@InfoAPC2015 -
@aral@lilianedwards@anbusch@csoghoian@InfoAPC2015 Such sponsors take away legitimacy of this conference. As bystander seems like a joke.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral@anbusch@csoghoian@InfoAPC2015 definitely the latter | the same happens in public health eg Pharma supporting anti-tobacco -
@alemannoEU@aral@anbusch this is not the same. FB & C support a conference where academics are largely against them.No interests in common -
@mantelero@aral@anbusch Show us the evidence! Plenty of merchants of doubt -
@alemannoEU@aral@anbusch You should be here and see. You should evaluate a conference on the basis of presented papers and discussions -
@mantelero@aral@anbusch I am sure you have read enough of@lessig to know what institutional corruption is - also in academia
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.