@OpenSensorsIO Can I go from using opensensors.io to Azondi seamlessly? That’s the core of the issue.
-
-
Replying to @aral
@aral the core issue is agreeing the definition of open. https://okfn.org/opendata/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OpenSensorsIO
.
@OpenSensorsIO Or, basically, we abandon “open” because it has lost all meaning. I’m actually leaning towards the latter.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aral
@aral a project becomes dominant in a space, export format of data becomes standard or a governing body creates a standard.@OpenSensorsIO1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ashedryden
@ashedryden My point re:@OpenSensorsIO is that it is a closed/proprietary system. Not a FOSS one like, e.g.,@zettajs1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral your tweets seem to suggest that you’re arguing that@OpenSensorsIO somehow violates the definition of the word “open”?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ashedryden
@ashedryden No, I was wrong:@OpenSensorsIO fits the definition of “open”. Open just doesn’t imply freedom. My mistake.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aral
@aral you have the freedom to take your data and build something around that. I’m not sure what you’re arguing around?@OpenSensorsIO2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ashedryden
@ashedryden …since@OpenSensorsIO is not FOSS, I cannot do that. That’s my core issue.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@ashedryden we keep iterating that our core is FOSS to enable you to do this. Surely having a transparent business model fairer than2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@OpenSensorsIO Isn’t Azondi just the core MQTT engine? Unless I’m mistaken it doesn’t contain the OpenSensorsIO API, does it? +@ashedryden
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.