I worry about discourse excluding the word privacy from talks about individuals & online security. Like here: https://simplysecure.org
@owenblacker Indeed, it’s worse—creates veneer of respectability for the corporate brand.+@futureidentity @mediamocracy @doctorow @nonlinear
-
-
@aral@owenblacker@futureidentity@mediamocracy@doctorow Best analogy is digital feudalism, with code languages as mecenate, proxy war. -
@nonlinear@aral@futureidentity@mediamocracy@doctorow I'm not sure I follow. I am sure, though, that I want to read a longer-form piece >
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral@futureidentity@mediamocracy@doctorow@nonlinear < a director and trustee) has received funding from Google-org in the past :o)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral@futureidentity@mediamocracy@doctorow@nonlinear < disagree on that point. Also, I should disclaim that mySociety (of which I am >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral@futureidentity@mediamocracy@doctorow@nonlinear I think that's both somewhat unfair and inaccurate. But we can probably agree to >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.