I worry about discourse excluding the word privacy from talks about individuals & online security. Like here: https://simplysecure.org
-
-
-
@mediamocracy They did not leave out privacy and focus on security by mistake. That’s exactly the misdirection Google is aiming for. -
@aral I know ;) It's a general problem. The security discourse is trying to eliminate privacy by obliviation for very obvious reasons.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Privacy can legitimately be sponsored by Google as much as sheep rights can legitimately be sponsored by the wolf.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, in summary, http://SimplySecure.org is misdirection sponsored by Google & Dropbox that knowingly conflates security with privacy. Ignore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@aral@mediamocracy@doctorow Simply Secure has little to say re#privacy b/c they think security covers it:https://www.constellationr.com/content/simply-secure-not-simply-private … -
.
@Steve_Lockstep Again, let’s be precise: they don’t “think security covers it”; they know it doesn’t but want to convince us that it does. -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.