I feel that that’s an important distinction, if a nuanced one.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everyone has a right to defend diversity as vocally as they want to because it is in all of our interests to do so.
-
@aral Diversity not rooted in reason is BS. I don't care where you come from, as long as you can reason. -
@AseDeliri That makes no sense. Diversity *is* rooted in reason. Diverse groups make better decisions. Look at the studies. -
@aral no sir. People have made it political. Everyone should be represented "equally". Not true. Only people trained and capable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And yet, on matters relating specifically to any one group that we do not ourselves belong to, we must let that group speak for themselves.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we can create opportunities for ourselves to step aside, we must. If we can amplify their voices, we must. That is good use of privilege.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope I’ve been able to articulate the nuance between those two concepts. They are not mutually exclusive but complimentary.
-
@aral Yes, very well put.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(It’s been on my mind for a while now but I haven’t been able to put it into words. Not succinctly, at least.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(Mind you, I’m not sure if this actually qualifies as succinct on Twitter.) :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral agreed, but you would get SO many arguments in this part of Texas :-/Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.