@aral they didn't claim "secrecy".
-
-
-
@chrismessina No, they just conveniently redefine what private means. As do Facebook, Google, et. al. In Orwellian terms, it’s doublethink. -
@aral trying to get to the core of your argument about privacy. What is their redefined definition of privacy? -
@chrismessina If you get a chance, read the transcript/watch https://ind.ie/the-camera-panopticon … — that’s the core of my argument about privacy. -
@aral it's not like I haven't shared your concerns previously... http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/11/privacy-publicity-and-open-data/ … Just unclear on a pragmatic approach. /cc@tobie -
@chrismessina ubiquitous targeting, effective fingerprinting and, well, mass surveillance, have changed the game.@aral -
@chrismessina the privacy we need today is one that's effectively protected from eavesdropper. Whether these be paranoid govs, …@aral -
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@aral I am speechless after reading the transcript of your talk. Wow...Ppl need to see this https://ind.ie/the-camera-panopticon … pic.twitter.com/5G6VLYYnB5”
-
@span870 Thanks, Simon :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral#ValentinesDay Roses are red, Violets are blue, It's me, you and GCHQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral and the NSA of course.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral opinions on Telegram? Spreading e2e crypto seems promising; has forgivably centralized infrastructure keyed on telephone numbers thoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.