@aral Respectfully, totally disagree with this statement.
-
-
-
@MiklosPhilips As is your right :) http://indietech.org/video -
@aral First half: thumbs up/ second half: thumbs down. :) -
@MiklosPhilips The second half is if you wanted to understand my statement beyond 140 letters. Given context, you may not wish to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral That statement, how valid it may be, sounds strange, even to your followers who are interested in these topics. Don’t alienate. -
@webdevotion Before we can hope to make a change, we must define our vocabulary and demarcate our position on the map.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral while I agree with your point re design critique+context, there's a whole death of the author school would dispute art/artist analogy -
@sophiedennis@aral You need to know the artist if the function of art is to extract money from the gullible. Good art stands on its own. -
@ponyaccess@sophiedennis My point was that you can critique on aesthetics but will not necessarily understand motivations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“
@aral: To talk of a design without understanding the business model that drives it is to critique an artwork without knowing the artist.”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral do we know yet what the business model for Stonehenge was?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.