With < 2 weeks to go @Aral - bit of a hero, doesn’t do nuance - takes issue with #Dontspyonus/ORG inviting @ricallan who works for FB.
-
-
Replying to @williamheath
So
@williamheath says no one better person to lead bill on privacy/civil liberties than Facebook employee@ricallen — agree? Alternatives?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral i don't see it's conflict of interest. They have considerable interest in it but different opinion from yours@williamheath@ricallen2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @brucel
@brucel@aral@williamheath@ricallen I'm pretty sure FB does not speak for the people when discussing privacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drheaddamage
@drheaddamage@aral@williamheath@ricallen Well, given that billions use FB, you could argue that the people have already chosen.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brucel
@brucel Don’t confuse “conned into using” with “chosen to use”. Pay with data is concealed barter.+@drheaddamage@williamheath@ricallen1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral you're alleging deliberate fraud ("conned")? What''s the proof?@drheaddamage@williamheath@ricallen2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brucel
@brucel It’s the foundation of the business model. “Free” is the lie. Concealed barter. Watch http://indietech.org/video+@drheaddamage …@williamheath@ricallen2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.