Disgusting: session to create ‘bill to protect our civil liberties’ to be led by director of policy for Facebook.https://www.dontspyonus.org.uk/day-of-action
-
-
Replying to @aral
Dear
@openrightsgroup, Why is director of policy for Facebook leading the session for a bill to protect civil liberties at Day of Action?2 replies 8 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aral
Having director of policy at Facebook leading the bill to protect civil liberties is having the fox leading the bill to protect the coop.
1 reply 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @aral
I’ve written to
@OpenRightsGroup + several of the keynote speakers at Day of Action to ask that this decision is reversed. Will update.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
Lord Richard Allan, director of policy for Facebook, has no legitimacy to lead a session on creating a bill to protect our civil liberties.
2 replies 7 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @williamheath
@williamheath@aral Facebook (& Google et al) are well placed to address mass state surveillance, the subject to hand.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NigelG
@NigelG@williamheath Mass state surveillance (dragnet govt surveillance) is only possible due to likes of Facebook & Google.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@williamheath that's like saying mass state surveillance is only possible due to the internet.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@NigelG No, it is saying that _dragnet_ govt surveillance is made possible by business model of corporate surveillance +@williamheath
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.