Disgusting: session to create ‘bill to protect our civil liberties’ to be led by director of policy for Facebook.https://www.dontspyonus.org.uk/day-of-action
-
-
Replying to @aral
Dear
@openrightsgroup, Why is director of policy for Facebook leading the session for a bill to protect civil liberties at Day of Action?2 replies 8 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aral
Having director of policy at Facebook leading the bill to protect civil liberties is having the fox leading the bill to protect the coop.
1 reply 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @aral
I’ve written to
@OpenRightsGroup + several of the keynote speakers at Day of Action to ask that this decision is reversed. Will update.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
Lord Richard Allan, director of policy for Facebook, has no legitimacy to lead a session on creating a bill to protect our civil liberties.
2 replies 7 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @williamheath
.
@williamheath I want an _independent_ voice who doesn’t work for the very company responsible for what the bill should protect us against.5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@williamheath I don’t speak for ORG but I think in this case it’s better to have key online providers in the discussion than left out.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jasonkitcat
@jasonkitcat@williamheath Remember that it is the business model of Facebook, Google, etc., that enables dragnet govt surveillance.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@williamheath This is a complex area. I don’t accept it’s just about big corporates being bad.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jasonkitcat It’s very simple once you understand what the business model of these corporations is. +@williamheath
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.