For me, the social implication, deconstruction of classic morale, bringing down privacy is the most fascinating aspect of QS #qseu14
-
-
Replying to @CommonFutrs
@CommonFutrs it will happen. So we have to think about what it will do to us and what rules we want to set up.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jbenno
@jbenno we need#personaldataasset protection + presumption in favour of choice about ‘investing’ in e.g.#datacoops http://okcast.org/2014/01/episode-1-5-annemarie-naylor-on-common-futures-data-coops-community-asset-ownership/ …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CommonFutrs
@CommonFutrs not feasable. We will have to deal with "the global village"http://datarella.com/organizing-a-system-of-10-billion-people/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jbenno
@jbenno I suspect@aral and myself wld prefer not to become corporate/panopticon ‘data creatures’, if we can#optout or#workaround …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CommonFutrs
@CommonFutrs@aral I fear, we already have become such creatures. The fiction of opting out keeps of from the necessary ethics discussion.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jbenno
@jbenno@CommonFutrs See http://indietech.org for my thoughts. Can’t go backwards; must shift ownership to individuals as we go forwards.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@CommonFutrs "individual" might be a modernist ("bourgeois") construct that we are going to loose.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jbenno The ‘bourgeois’ construct is the current capitalist elite of data miners / dataowners (Google, FB, @Datarella, etc.) +@CommonFutrs
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.