@frabcus Reading now. Would not call @transportapi open in any way. Confused by partnership with @UKODI & mission of ODI. Help @agentGav? :)
-
-
Replying to @aral
@aral@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi@UKODI ODI helps to stimulate both the creation and/or usage of OD http://ow.ly/wCSsu - both impt2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @agentGav
@agentGav I fail to see how calling closed system w proprietary API ‘open’ is not redefining the word. +@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi this conversation needs more nouns. "open" isn't a thing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agentGav
@agentGav@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi That’s definitely the feeling I’m getting also :) Going to start using free/libre for precision.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi using "free/libre" has no utility here, since open *data* is, by definition freely licensed (e.g. OGL)4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agentGav
@agentGav If we are to have independent products, we need free/libre data. e.g., OpenStreetMaps.+@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@agentGav@frabcus@transportapi I'm in a meeting. Respond later. Meanwhile who are you saying is in authority about what is open?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MadProf What I’m saying is that describing @transportapi as an ‘open platform’ is inaccurate. It is a closed platform. +@agentGav @frabcus
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.