Looking at @transportapi (https://developer.transportapi.com ) & wondering just what about it is ‘open’. Seems closed/proprietary. Thoughts, @ukodi?
@frabcus Reading now. Would not call @transportapi open in any way. Confused by partnership with @UKODI & mission of ODI. Help @agentGav? :)
-
-
@aral@frabcus@transportapi@UKODI@agentGav Open is a broad church. We are open content & reserve no rights downstream. We charge 4 scale -
@MadProf Ah, not a great fan of churches either. Shame. Good to know, though, thanks. +@frabcus@transportapi@UKODI@agentGav -
@aral@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi@UKODI ODI helps to stimulate both the creation and/or usage of OD http://ow.ly/wCSsu - both impt -
@agentGav I fail to see how calling closed system w proprietary API ‘open’ is not redefining the word. +@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi -
@aral@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi this conversation needs more nouns. "open" isn't a thing. -
@agentGav@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi That’s definitely the feeling I’m getting also :) Going to start using free/libre for precision. -
@aral@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi using "free/libre" has no utility here, since open *data* is, by definition freely licensed (e.g. OGL) -
@agentGav This license (https://developer.transportapi.com/terms ) is not open. It merely allows use via restrictive terms. +@MadProf@frabcus@transportapi - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.