@aral It's worse than that. http://benjaminmayo.co.uk/getty-images-embeddable …
-
-
-
@BenjaminZAMayo Excellent point!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral Good point. Not even wide enough to fill a Tumblr (desktop) column on a non-Retina display.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral@craiggrannell Also of notice: as iframes only and they reserve the right to add ads. o_Ohttps://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/441504909691977728 … -
@aral@craiggrannell …which i see you tweeted after the one i responded to. :P
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral 400px? OMG! What were they thinking? Should be at least 640. -
@TomRaftery@aral they weren't thinking. -
@inkovic They know exactly what they’re doing. It’s a clever bit of PR to try and preserve a model that is collapsing@TomRaftery@aral
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral Not very iterative of you—that can change.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral although great for mobile.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral for inline web images in a mobile data connection world that's fine, isn't it? Not for a header/banner image, obviously.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.