@aral @clemux @MyCozyCloud @gemmahentsch it’s sexual, not sexist.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral@clemux@MyCozyCloud@gemmahentsch can someone mansplain to me how I'm supposed to give a female a handjob? -
@paddyforan@aral@clemux@MyCozyCloud@gemmahentsch I think it’s technically possible to give another male a handjob. -
@fabiocionini@clemux my boyfriend agrees. But you don't see anything problematic about naming it for a sex act only men can enjoy? -
@paddyforan@clemux I think women involved are generally enjoying it too ;) btw the problem is not sexism, just an ugly and weird naming -
@fabiocionini@clemux but you don't see how it privileges male pleasure? Why can't it be both? -
@paddyforan@clemux hey, we’re talking about an idiotically named software. being a bit too much p.c. here? let’s propose “Qooralsex” ok? -
@fabiocionini@clemux I'd agree that "Qooralsex" would just be stupid, not sexist. But Handjoob is objectively sexist. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.