-
-
-
@AnthroPunk@skry What exactly would you like me to rephrase? I'd be surprised if they didn't have them. -
-
@AnthroPunk@aral We could call them "decorative women" or "naked signage" etc. I'm not sure which euphemisms are less dehumanizing wrt role -
-
@AnthroPunk@skry You are confused. There is no sexism *towards* booth babes. The existence of booth babes is sexism. -
-
@AnthroPunk@skry No, sexualising women to promote your products is derogatory. Calling the practice by its name — booth babes — isn’t. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@aral How useful, glasses that tell me I'm eating lettuce in my salad. -
@alex_gibson To be honest, the dude in the video probably benefits from that sort of information :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral Must be the day for it. Someone arguing with me earlier that they thought page 3 was fine because they weren’t a puritan. Gah. -
@CraigGrannell Idiots—the Interwebs has them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral Maybe time to re-think the whole "don't hit a guy with glasses" idea. I feel like I need a shower.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral The logical end result of years of narcissistic male dominance in the technology sector. Time to turn that ship around.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aral *scrubs self with wire brush* Ugh. Just ugh. On the plus side, in reality the pool shark would have kicked the shit out of the cheat.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.