@mattpointblank @seb_ly The very fact that it’s an article giving advice to students biased by commercial interests of Currys/PC World sucks
-
-
Replying to @mattpointblank
@mattpointblank@seb_ly Not an add, it says ‘in association with Currys/PC World’. Is that an ad? Or does it mean they had input.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@mattpointblank that’s the critical question we need to have answered.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattpointblank
@mattpointblank I was hoping you might have some better info than “as far as I can tell” :)@aral1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seb_ly
@seb_ly@aral was just looking for it :) read this: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/dec/04/sponsorship-editorial-independence?guni=Article:in%20body%20link …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattpointblank
@mattpointblank@aral in association with : “Commercially led editorial content originates with the client.” :-(3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seb_ly
@seb_ly@mattpointblank Just read that. It’s sad. So much for my naive trust.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@mattpointblank @seb_ly Yeah, I don’t like such ‘reality’-ies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.