-
-
Replying to @ihateravenholm
@ihateravenholm@aral familiarity breeds contempt1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @maradydd
@ihateravenholm less glibly, gmail at least used to be the leading product as far as UX goes. Not so much these days, but still.@aral2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ihateravenholm
@ihateravenholm Can you please point me to the section in the article that says it is ‘read by [a] person’?+@maradydd1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ihateravenholm
@ihateravenholm@maradydd We as in the company. Yes, it is vague on purpose. Because reading is reading when the intent is to profile.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ihateravenholm
@ihateravenholm No, point is an entity has your personal info. Seriously, you’re nitpicking & missing the forest for the trees. +@maradydd2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral imho you started with singling out one tree .. while there's a forest of them..@ihateravenholm@maradydd1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@tomhermans @ihateravenholm @maradydd Guilty as charged. The nerve of some people, eh? :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.