RT @jamesallworth: @aral then why did he agree to it?
’cos he was hoodwinked by an unethical bastard (sorry, ‘negotiation genius’) #ethics
@jamesallworth …Are these the ethics that should be thought/promoted at @Harvard ?
-
-
@aral though I’d be curious of your views of the societal benefit of winding up a presidential campaign just to pay a photographer. -
@jamesallworth False dichotomy; those weren’t the only options. They could have acted ethically and paid him a fair amount. -
@aral or he could have paid them a fair amount to be featured in a presidential campaign? How is that unethical? -
.
@jamesallworth (Will you pay to work on a presidential campaign? Why should the photographer?) -
@aral I might. Plenty of people volunteer, for example - paying with time. What matters from an ethical perspective is that I can say no -
.
@jamesallworth So whatever you can get people to agree to is ethical? Interesting definition of ethics. -
@aral I didn’t say that. And rather than trying to twist words, I’d be much more curious for you to articulate what the ethical breach was. -
@jamesallworth Just asked my followers what they think. Looking forward to hearing their responses. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@aral A little less self-righteous indignation and a little more thinking. There was nothing amoral that happened in that situationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.