@laurakalbag @LeaVerou …thanks for the heads up :) Would be nice to create a snopes for CSS to separate fact from folklore.
-
-
Replying to @laurakalbag
@laurakalbag I’m not saying it’s made up. I’m saying I’d like a good reference to refer to. Will keep searching.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @laurakalbag
@laurakalbag I don’t see anything wrong with that. Would be a very useful resource :)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@laurakalbag@LeaVerou px weren’t zoomable in IE < 7. There are no accessibility issues in (more) modern browsers as they have zoom3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yatil
@yatil Are there any accessibility issues you know of in setting _root font size_ using pixels in modern browsers? +@laurakalbag@LeaVerou2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@laurakalbag@LeaVerou …convert any px values to the minimum. If I set 14px, your 1px would be interpreted as 14px afaik.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yatil
@yatil@laurakalbag@LeaVerou That’s the behaviour I’ve seen. Would be more correct if browsers applied min px setting to computed values…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@laurakalbag@LeaVerou I think it’s because they treat px as a fixed unit instead of a relative one. That’s a bug to me.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@yatil @laurakalbag @LeaVerou Agree. All elements that matter may be > user’s min size and still will get scaled if root font size is < it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.