RT @DrTomCrick: A lifelong dream fulfilled: name-checked on page 3 of today’s Daily Mail.
+1
@loobey41 @elsiedotm @DrTomCrick @MiniGirlGeek Mail article was about the controversy, not what was said during.
-
-
@aral@loobey41@drtomcrick@teknoteacher We'll stay content with The Times p3 instead, which was thanks to@hubmum xpic.twitter.com/CQE9NnM4
-
@elsiedotm@aral@loobey41@drtomcrick@teknoteacher anything ANYTHING other than the DM -
@hubmum@aral@loobey41@drtomcrick@teknoteacher Maybe@First_News would like to pick up the real story & not the controversy? :) x -
@elsiedotm@aral@drtomcrick@teknoteacher I have asked Telegraph and Mail the same. The latter just ran story w/o contact, but former might -
@hubmum@aral@drtomcrick@teknoteacher ok :) & First News would reach the 7-14yo target. Circulation = 1million+ kids http://www.firstnews.co.uk/about -
@elsiedotm@aral@DrTomCrick@teknoteacher that's more like it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral@loobey41@drtomcrick@teknoteacher Ah not to worry - maybe controversy makes for a better story?! :Ppic.twitter.com/3ARlDv9w
-
@elsiedotm@aral@loobey41@drtomcrick That's tremendously reassuring. For a moment I thought Daily Mail had changed its spots.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.