@sophiedennis I've seen (3) a lot. Folk trying to tell folk what to do when servant leadership better approach. /cc @aral @leisa
@ralphsaunders @adrianh @daveixd @leisa @sophiedennis Until you actually start making a thing, all design is varying degrees of assumption.
-
-
@aral@adrianh@daveixd@leisa@sophiedennis Certainly there's compromise, but ultimately the code is the way a design is implemented. -
@ralphsaunders@aral@adrianh@daveixd@leisa do we agree great UX needs design + dev? Perhaps any skew too far to one or other is harmful? -
@sophiedennis What happens if we try and have a conversation about great UX without either label? /cc@ralphsaunders@aral@daveixd@leisa -
@adrianh I guess I'm saying: great UX is the shared goal of all members of the interdisciplinary team@ralphsaunders@aral@daveixd@leisa -
@sophiedennis Yes. That I can vote for :) And on that positive note - Goodnight all. Off to bed. /cc@ralphsaunders@aral@daveixd@leisa -
@adrianh@sophiedennis@ralphsaunders@daveixd@leisa ’night ’night
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aral we also know that there are other useful ways of evaluating design assumptions, too. /@ralphsaunders@adrianh@leisa@sophiedennisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.