@timothystringer yup :)
-
-
Replying to @laurakalbag
@laurakalbag it's what your letters sit on and (normally) where your descender starts :/1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @timothystringer
@timothystringer that’s my feeling.@aral prefers to have the bottom of the element sit on the baseline.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @laurakalbag
@laurakalbag not sure the@aral method would strictly class as a baseline but yours defo would :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @timothystringer
@timothystringer@laurakalbag …Hence baseline in print is different to baseline in CSS. A good preso on this stuff: http://www.maxdesign.com.au/articles/css-line-height/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral@laurakalbag would you not class baseline as a typographic term? Regardless of whether it's in print or screen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @timothystringer
@timothystringer@laurakalbag Yep. Maybe we need a better term for a vertical rhythm grid for CSS.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral or you should just call it that when it’s that, and baseline grid when it’s using the baseline… +@timothystringer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @laurakalbag
@laurakalbag@timothystringer Well, on the web it’s been used interchangeably. Not sure the added confusion of a new term is justified.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
@aral but has it been incorrectly used interchangeably?! +@timothystringer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@laurakalbag @timothystringer No, I think it has simply been adapted to mean base line-height grid.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.