Very disappointed to hear that my interventions/talk at #NordicPrivacyArena about not legitimising surveillance capitalists at “privacy” events have fallen on deaf ears: the first keynote announced for next year’s event is by Google's Global Privacy Counsel.
#privacywashing
-
-
It's not black & white. Certain people at Google/Facebook may want to improve privacy (and some technical solutions/standards may do so, e.g. HTTP/2 makes TLS mandatory). Whether it's "all of the privacy" and whether the employer business model limits the employee is complicated
-
No, you know what, it *is* fucking black and white. Their business model is not up for debate. It’s not complicated. It’s very simple: Google is a factory farm for and it will never be an animal sanctuary. It’s way past time that people got that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This gives me similar feelings to the recent "Magna Carta" for the web. Well intentioned, but with out specific technological solutions to give sovereignty and autonomy back to people, it's just an open goal for the Google PR team to soft-tap into.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
which one is better and more efficient - I can't tell. But I think we should have many people for each of the four options.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if you want to improve privacy you have 4 options: - be an activist and evangelist (e.g. you) - create privacy-preserving competitor service (e.g.DuckDuckGo, you) - work from the inside to make the organization more accountable and privacy-aware - become a politician and regulate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.