Rename “cookies” to “trackers” and you’d see some progress. Who wouldn’t want to “accept cookies”?! Has anyone ever turned down a delicious cookie? But who would want to “accept trackers”?
-
-
Replying to @jasonfried
Not all cookies are trackers. What about implicit website funcionality?
2 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
-
Replying to @jasonfried
;-) GDPR actually requires you to state the reason(s), not just say cookies in general. So, this is covered.
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
-
Replying to @jasonfried @dusoft
If you access sites via a VPN server in the EU, you’ll see the granularity that’s exposed: complaint interfaces also have to display essential cookies vs marketing ones and implement opt-in for the latter. (Not all sites get it right + lots of dark patterns/non-compliance.)
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
The key point being it’s new and the first test cases have only just been filed. The definition of personal data will itself be effected by the precedents set (deanonymisation, etc.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.