I have very little love for Mozilla myself. However, when you preemptively reject any opposition - as in your sentence: "For anyone replying “I would”, I have a bridge in Brooklyn […]" - It sounds dogmatic, regardless of whether you right or wrong.
-
-
-
Ah, right, I have far less of an issue with your having an issue with that. That was just my way of saying that if you don’t believe such financial interests affect outcomes than you are, in my very humble opinion, rather naïve.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But Aral, they paid you a billion dollars with no strings attached! Perfectly aboveboard!
-
Indeed :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Dogmatic? For pointing out blatant multibillion-dollar institutional corruption? Irony is dead!
What exactly is it about the concept of “IF I PAY YOU A BILLION DOLLARS you are not going to work against my interests“ that is so difficult to understand?