Previous ONS statistics have been widely misused, and difficult to interpret due to unavailable methods This is all put to bed now. Excellent, transparent comparisons with a suitable control group. Importantly, it includes COVID cases which would be missed by NHS testing 2/
-
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
One statistic stands out At both 4 and 12 weeks, MORE children aged 2 - 11y in the control group were experiencing symptoms than in those who tested positive for
#COVID19 3/pic.twitter.com/lAK3l2XN1a
Näytä tämä ketju -
Rates of continuous symptoms going on for 12w were also extremely low for kids aged 2 - 16y who had tested positive for
#COVID19 (only around 1%) This was generally low across the study (3% of COVID +ve vs 0.5% of controls) 4/pic.twitter.com/v8db0IYqVl
Näytä tämä ketju -
Even using a "catch all" term by asking people if they self diagnosed themselves with long covid, rates in children were still extremely low Especially those with symptoms which impacted daily living (only 1% of children aged 2 - 11y 5/pic.twitter.com/z6KTHG6mAr
Näytä tämä ketju -
Despite a huge amount of concern, these statistics back up what we are seeing in practice with kids Whilst debilitating for those it does affect,
#LongCovid is not a huge problem for the overwhelming majority of children who are infected with#SARSCoV2 6/Näytä tämä ketju -
Hopefully soon we can move into more specific nomenclature Children with isolated anosmia or post viral cough should not be categorised together with children who have the more typically considered "long covid" symptoms of fatigue, brain fog, breathlessness etc 7/
Näytä tämä ketju -
I should add - there is a zombie statistic going around that 1/7 children get long covid. This is nonsense. It it based on a complete misunderstanding of the CLoCK study (see thread here) 8/https://twitter.com/apsmunro/status/1433068282060365827?s=20 …
Näytä tämä ketju -
This is because at 12w 30% of children with covid had 3 or more symptoms compared to 16% without covid Saying that 1/7 had long covid is therefore saying 1/7 of the general population of 11-17yo also have the equivalent of long covid at any one time Disregard this statistic 9/
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is excellent news. The 1 in 7 statistic was clearly nonsense (even anecdotal evidence would tell you the same). I hope that "Independent Sage" stops repeating this daft stat.
-
Disclaimer from ONS about the symptoms they looked at in CYP.
#LongCovidpic.twitter.com/IEzFgMVrNe
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
1/