a_pretty_a_day

@aprettyaday

Belgian linguist postdoc at HU Berlin. (acquisition of) semantics (tense/aspect/modality) & interfaces

berlin
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2007.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @aprettyaday

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @aprettyaday

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 17 sati

    Nadathur, Prerna: Causality, aspect, and modality in actuality inferences

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Help me, . I want to illustrate some real-world fast mapping to my morphology students. What's a new word/concept we all learned in the last six months after only limited exposure? The edgier the better.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Looking at the Panini Linguistics Olympiad website and imagining the joys of a childhood full of linguistics puzzle solving! If you are an educator/parent consider giving your students/children exposure to the exciting world of language (as) science!

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    Linguists, what would you say is a "recent" English grammar? (E.g., if one wants to check sth or a reference)

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    5. sij

    For anyone who, like me, had never seen this before: Josef Fruehwald, Prolegomena to a Theory of Knitting. It is HILARIOUS, though possibly only for knitters and (or?) people familiar with formal linguistics.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 5. sij

    des créations (?): se stoner, détoxer et plein nominalisations de relatives (du qui crève la faim, du qui ne sait pas lire) ou même d'adverbes (des malgré nous) bref c'est créatif

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 5. sij

    des nouvelles lectures psych/abstraites: - calculer, déployer, annuler, impacter, faucher quelqu'un

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 5. sij

    j'ai reçu vernon subutex de despentes pour noël et listé les emplois intéressants de verbes qui me semblent pas dictionarisés (pas vérifié cela dit). Beaucoup de transitivisations d'intransitifs: - halluciner quelqu'un - exploser quelqu'un - décoller quelqu'un 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 5. sij

    Thus mapping ‘was’ with ‘quoi’, but *never* uses the German word order with inversion (*quoi fais tu?) in those questions, although she has plenty of German syntax elsewhere (eg V2, color adjectives before the noun, etc). Why not ‘quoi fais-tu’??2/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 5. sij

    ‘What are you doing’ translates ‘tu fais quoi?’ or ‘qu’est-ce que tu fais’ in French (no subject verb inversion) and ‘was machst du’ in German (with inversion). GE-FR 2L1 6yo always says ‘quoi tu fais?’, afaik not part of monolingual child (and adult) French 1/2

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 3. sij

    I only realize now that (disbalanced) German-French 2L1 6yo has agreement in French for adjectives in modifier position but never in predicative position (just as in German)

    Poništi
  12. 26. pro 2019.

    THIS in English!! But I guess you need the progressive and the “right now”?so it’s not Brazilian Portuguese yet

    Poništi
  13. 20. pro 2019.

    Cate le bon really sounds like slapp happy imho

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. pro 2019.

    Are you a native speaker of Hindi / Urdu? Got 5 minutes to spare? Please consider helping collect some pilot data by filling out a short google form survey! Thank you!

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. pro 2019.

    Does anyone know of a transitivity classifier? Anything that can predict if a bunch of verbs in my database are intransitive or transitive?

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. pro 2019.

    Ma fille range ses crayons en chantonnant: « Stylo smanien! Stylo Smanien! » J’ose lui demander ce que sont les stylos Smaniens? Elle me répond que ce sont les stylos qui ont servi à dessiner Paris car « Maman m’a expliqué que beaucoup d’immeubles là-bas sont de stylo Smanien! »

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. pro 2019.

    Anyone out there happen to speak a language that uses proprial articles (articles that occur with proper names but that are not the same form as the definite)? I have a couple of questions!

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Why does English have nearby and close-by, but no next-by, top-by, left-by etc. where the point of reference is omitable as well?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 6. pro 2019.

    thanks for the RT! in fact i would be interested in any work on transitivity alternations/(anti-)causatives in SLs in general...

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Anyone done any work on this for ? The examples seem to work in BSL and Auslan but I’m not confident as I’ve not explored this issue myself.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·