There, two first-time candidates squared off over a vacated GOP seat in a district that was estimated R+8; Kopser (Dem) ended up 3% behind. That red blob is the Texas Hill Country, which has about as much to do with Austin as Stockton, CA does with SF. But the tactic worked.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Or take TX-25, where first-time candidate Julie Oliver (my story starts in her campaign office) tried to overcome a R+11 disadvantage. Similar story: urban Austin diluted by rural areas stretching practically to Dallas. She finished down by 8%.pic.twitter.com/gwZgIsoSvF
Show this thread -
Surely there must be Dem voters that can't be topologically diluted somehow., right? Indeed, there are. That's TX-35, a planned concession to the Dems, and Austin's only blue district. That tendril connecting the blue areas runs along Highway 35, and is mostly unpopulated.pic.twitter.com/FS8ukIuXIk
Show this thread -
This is the gerrymanderer's playbook: dilute the opposition's voters *just* enough to win by a healthy 10%, then concede a district where they win by a landslide, wasting as few supporters as possible. TX-35 was won by Dems by 45%(!). All those Dem voters were essentially wasted.
Show this thread -
A newly-revitalized Texas Dem party was routed in the House: not a single district on the DCCC 'red to blue' flip list went Dem. The races finished much tighter than predicted though, with TX-23 being lost by only 300 votes. What's this mean for a possible 'blue Texas'?
Show this thread -
The gerrymanderer faces two problems: 1. Margin of victory in even rigged districts tends to be low, as you want to spend as few voters to win as possible. That means if there's a statewide bump in your opposition, all your districts start flipping at once, like dominoes.
Show this thread -
2. Texas has a booming economy, and last year was the fastest growing state in the US. Gerrymandering is a 'fire-and-forget' tactic that can only get updated in post-census redistricting. Toward the end of that 10-year cycle, the districts are off, and an overthrow is possible.
Show this thread -
The Dems have one last shot in 2020 to seize control of the state legislature and other statewide offices to control the post-2020 redistricting. If they don't pull it off, the GOP will redraw the map, and TX will be frozen red for another decade. The stakes are high.
Show this thread -
This isn't mere hyperbole: the red Texas we take for granted was largely the result of back-to-back redistricting ploys by the GOP, first by DeLay in 2000, and then a Karl-Rove-inspired effort in 2010. Who draws the map, holds the territory, whatever the shifting demographics.
Show this thread -
The other piece of the TX political puzzle is voter registration and turnout. "Texas isn't a red state, it's a non-voting state," said more than one Dem official. That's at least partly true, as voting in Texas is hard, and kept so by state officials.https://www.wired.com/story/flipping-texas-elections-voter-registration-tech/ …
Show this thread -
The key to Dem victory in Texas (and other sunbelt states like FL or GA) is voter registration and turnout. The demographics of the ballots in the box do not reflect the demographics of the state, and fighting to maintain or remove that discrepancy is the focus of each party.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
BOTH parties are guilty of this...if/when the Dems have the power, they will rig it in their favor. California is very red, but the big cities make it blue. Is that fair? Its a game both parties play at the expense of the people.
-
.....dude that's how it's meant to work. Cities are highly populated so of course in a democracy that'll win out
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Antonio, do you have good numbers on what the impact of principled-yet-blind maps would be? Say it's an algorithm like, "Equal population areas starting from the center of biggest cities," or "Equal population areas trying to make each district's urban:rural ratio the same"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just understand how rigging the districts is legal, or why it was ever even allowed in the first place. Would just straight grid lines through each State be more fair, or is that not feasible?
-
*don't understand
-
That’s not feasible because each district is supposed to have similar population counts
-
Ah, I see. Thank you. There's got to be some fair impartial way to implement districts, other than this partisan crap pulled by both sides at some points.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

